INSPECTION REPORT
INSPECTION AGREEMENT SUMMARY: Your Company & Sample Client
This document constitutes a legally binding contract and details the terms of the home inspection carried out by Your Company. Clients are advised to review this agreement carefully. The inspection fee is based on the time invested in conducting the inspection and preparing the report, independent of repair costs, and is due regardless of the property purchase decision. No responsibility is assumed for costs related to identified or future defects. The inspector disclaims knowledge of any items not explicitly mentioned in this report. The services of relevant professionals (electricians, plumbers, HVAC technicians, roofers, structural engineers) may be necessary to address issues noted.
DESCRIPTION OF INSPECTION FINDINGS:
- Inspected: Area or component was thoroughly examined, and no issues were found at the time of inspection.
- Not Inspected: Area or supporting component was not inspected and may require further evaluation.
- Not Present: Area or component does not exist on the property or could not be visually located.
- Moisture Evidence Present: Visible signs of moisture or water-related issues were observed; further evaluation is recommended.
INSPECTION DETAILS:
- Visual Only: This inspection is a non-invasive, visual examination of the readily accessible areas of the property to identify material defects in specified systems and components.
- Scope: A visual review of accessible areas to identify defects in specified systems and components, modifiable upon client-inspector agreement.
- Limitations: The inspection is not exhaustive, excluding hidden, concealed, or inaccessible defects. Personal belongings and furniture are not moved during the inspection.
- Equipment Testing: Involves testing responses to normal controls without disassembly, except for easily removable service panels.
- Observation-Based: Findings are specific to the inspection date and do not predict future conditions. Not all defects may be identified.
- Material Defects: Identified issues significantly affecting property value or posing unreasonable risks.
EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS:
- Limited solely to the paid inspection fee. Excludes liability for repair costs, property damage, or injury. The report is intended only for the client named above and is not a guarantee, warranty, or insurance policy.
CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
- Non-Compliance and Hidden Defects: Areas not evaluated for safety code compliance may contain hidden defects that cannot be identified during a visual inspection.
- Special Loan Types: This inspection does not assess or comment on FHA standards, which are subject to change.
- Environmental and Specialized Inspections: This inspection does not include testing for radon, lead-based paint, asbestos, mold, or other potentially hazardous substances. Private systems and pest inspections are also excluded.
- Liability: Liability is limited solely to the amount of the paid inspection fee. The inspection report does not cover repair costs, property damage, or injury. It is intended exclusively for the client and does not serve as a guarantee, warranty, or insurance policy.
- Modern Standards: Highlights safety issues but does not inspect for code compliance. Observations on mixed materials and incomplete areas are included. Manufacturer recalls are not part of the inspection.
- Included Items: Items not listed in this report were not inspected or evaluated. The inspection was limited to the components and conditions documented in the report.
Table of Contents
GENERAL SUMMARY
Inspector Name
The following items or discoveries indicate that these systems or components do not function as intended or adversely affects the habitability of the dwelling; or warrants further investigation by a specialist, or requires subsequent observation. This summary shall not contain recommendations for routine upkeep of a system or component to keep it in proper functioning condition or recommendations to upgrade or enhance the function or efficiency of the home. This Summary is not the entire report. The complete report may include additional information of concern to the customer. It is recommended that the customer read the complete report.
1. Roof - Summary
Roof Covering Materials
Inspected
1.1-3
Shingle deterioration was observed on the roof covering materials. This condition may affect the performance and longevity of the roof covering. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified roofing contractor are recommended.
1.1-5
Shingles with damage and missing granules were observed. This condition can lead to accelerated deterioration of the roof covering material. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified roofing contractor are recommended.
1.1-6
Cracked shingles with damage and ripped areas with missing granules were observed on the roof covering materials. This condition can lead to premature deterioration and potential moisture intrusion. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair.
Chimney
Inspected
1.5-1
The chimney was observed to be missing a cover. This condition may allow for the entry of rain, debris, and animals into the flue. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for the installation of a chimney cover. Comments on visual areas only.
2. Exterior - Summary
Exterior Wall Covering Materials
Inspected
2.1-1
Advanced deteriorating siding was observed at the time of inspection. This condition can lead to further damage and potential moisture intrusion. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement.
2.1-5
Advanced wood rot and deterioration was observed at the time of inspection. Further evaluation is recommended. Hidden damages in the area are likely.
2.1-9
Siding deterioration inconsistent with its expected lifespan was observed in localized areas. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement. End of life span in areas.
2.1-12
Lifting or moving of finish materials was observed nearby; determining the cause goes beyond the scope of this inspection. Further evaluation is recommended to assess for advanced deterioration or wood rot.
2.1-13
Advanced wood deterioration was observed around multiple windows or siding. Hidden damages are suspected; determining their extent goes beyond the scope of this inspection, and further evaluation is recommended.
Windows (Exterior)
Inspected
2.3-1
Advanced wood rot was observed around many or several of the windows. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified contractor is recommended.
A cracked window was observed at the time of inspection. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair.
2.3-4
Advanced wood deterioration was observed around several or most of the exterior windows. This condition may indicate an entrance point or hidden damages, and further evaluation is recommended.
2.3-5
A broken window was observed at the time of inspection. Repair or replacement is recommended.
2.3-12
Windows that would not meet modern height limitations from the ground were observed. Installation of safety glass windows is recommended.
Exterior Doors
Inspected
2.4-1
The threshold at or near the door was observed to move or may have rotted, with nearby movement of the wall, . Further evaluation is recommended.
2.4-4
An advanced wood rod was observed at the rear or side entry door. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement.
Walkways & Driveways
Inspected
2.6-2
The walkway, step, appears to be at the end of its lifespan, with deterioration noted where it meets the siding or home. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement.
Porches, Patios, Balconies & Carports
Inspected
2.8-2
Separation or movement of the porch was observed at the time of inspection. Determining if this is past or future movement goes beyond the scope of this inspection; further evaluation is recommended.
Decks, Railings, Guards & Handrails
Inspected
2.9-4
Deteriorating deck materials were observed at the time of inspection, based on visual assessment only. This condition can affect the long-term integrity and lifespan of the deck. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement of the affected materials. Materials past half of life span or nearing end of life.
Detached Structure
Inspected
2.11-6
Advanced deterioration with nearby trenching was observed. Further evaluation by a qualified contractor is recommended to determine if safe conditions exist long term.
2.11-9
Advanced wood rot and deterioration were observed where materials are in contact with soil. This condition will continue to deteriorate over time, and repair is recommended.
2.11-18
Advanced deterioration and active moisture entry were observed. A wood rot was also noted; further evaluation and repair by qualified professionals are recommended.
2.11-19
Structural components were observed to be not level, and nearby walls were noted as not plumb. Further evaluation by a qualified structural engineer is recommended.
3. Structural Components - Summary
Foundation
Inspected
3.1-1
Wood deterioration and exposed areas were observed. Continued deterioration may increase the chance of future settlement or damage. Further evaluation and repairs by a qualified professional are recommended as needed.
3.1-5
A likely entrance point for moisture was observed, and further evaluation is recommended for hidden damage such as wood rot. Visible light gap visible from basement is indication of maintenance/repair to reduce chance of further damages or moisture/insect entry.
3.1-9
White discoloration was observed on the floor structure. Determining if mold is present goes beyond the scope of this inspection; lab test testing is recommended. Area dry at time however nearby pipes had condensation.
Crawl Space
Not Inspected
3.3-1
No access was available to this area of the crawlspace. The photograph is representative of the area and is provided for reference only. Conditions in inaccessible areas were not inspected.
Limited or no access was available in several areas of the crawlspace due to height limitations, debris, fallen stone and rubble, moisture, and lack of a vapor barrier. These conditions restricted access to portions of the crawlspace, and comments are based on accessible visual areas only. Conditions concealed by limited access or debris were not inspected. Further evaluation of the crawlspace and noted conditions is recommended as needed.
Structural Components
Inspected
3.4-1
Advanced wood rot and materials that appear to be bowing were observed in the wall. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended to determine the extent of damage and appropriate repairs.
4. Heating & Cooling - Summary
Fuel, Piping & Support
Inspected
4.4-1
Potential asbestos tape was observed on the ductwork at the time of inspection. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended.
5. Plumbing - Summary
Main Water Supply Shut-Off Valve
Deficient
5.1-1
Active moisture was observed at the main water pipe. Correction is recommended to reduce the chance of further moisture-related damage. A qualified plumber can evaluate the connection and provide repair options.
Water Heater - Venting, TPR Valves & Seismic Bracing
InspectedA sulfur odor was noted in the water supply. Further evaluation or correction is recommended.
Drain, Waste & Vent System
Inspected
5.7-1
The inspector disclaimed knowledge regarding plumbing components or septic systems requiring certification.
Sump Pumps w/ Accessible Floats
Inspected
5.9-1
The sump pump appeared to be installed in a dirt excavation rather than a dedicated sump pit. The pump and installation did not appear consistent with modern sump pit installations. Further evaluation by a qualified plumber or contractor is recommended.
Water Softener & Filtration
Not Inspected
5.10-1
An intermittent leak was observed, with its source identified by standing water contained by a bucket. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified professional is recommended.
6. Electrical - Summary
Service connection
InspectedComments based on visual areas only. Home appeared to have partially updated system however due to aged components further evaluation is recommended. Lack of certification tags, which limits information for the inspector.
Meter and Service Wiring
Inspected
6.2-1
A lack of a certification tag was observed. Further evaluation is recommended to determine compliance.
Main Panel and Breakers
Inspected
6.3-1
Aged electrical components for fuses were observed, lacking a certification tag, which is common in homes of this age. Further evaluation by a qualified electrician is recommended.
6.3-2
A lack of certification, tags, or labels was noted at the time of inspection. Further evaluation is recommended. Not able to determine if work was performed by persons unfamiliar with standards of practice preformed work. Evaluation of the fuel system by a qualified Electrician is strongly recommended.
Switches and Fixtures
Inspected
6.5-3
Missing face plates were observed in multiple or most areas. Localized reverse polarity was also noted, and further evaluation and repair by a qualified electrician is recommended.
GFCI protection was not observed in the kitchen. Repair by a qualified electrician is recommended to meet modern standards.
6.5-7
A cracked ground plug was observed at the time of inspection. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified electrician are recommended.
Smoke/CO detectors
Deficient
6.7-1
Additional smoke and carbon monoxide detectors may be needed to provide adequate coverage throughout the home. Install additional detectors as needed based on current requirements and manufacturer recommendations.
8. Attic, Insulation & Ventilation - Summary
Insulation in Unfinished Spaces (including attics, crawl spaces and foundation areas) *
Inspected
8.1-2
A strong odor was present in the attic at the time of inspection. Determining if it is related to rodent or pest activity goes beyond the scope of this inspection; further evaluation is recommended. Live bats observed at time.
Ventilation of Unfinished Spaces (including attics, crawl spaces and foundation areas)
Inspected
8.2-2
Full access to the attic was limited by a hatch that was not modern size as well as non-safe conditions for the inspector. Removal of bats needs for safe entry. Locate and correct. Obtain cost estimate for removal and cleanup as needed.
Misc Findings.
Deficient
8.4-1
Active bats were observed in the attic. Access to the attic was very limited, and areas that could not be safely accessed were not inspected. Further evaluation by a qualified wildlife professional is recommended.
9. Interior - Summary
Floors, Walls and Ceilings
InspectedInterior unfinished materials were observed at the time of inspection. Updated paint or materials may conceal past damages or defects; ask seller about this finding.
Stairs, Steps, Landings, Stairways & Ramps
Inspected
9.2-1
A handrail was not present for the basement stairs. Installation by a qualified contractor is recommended. This is a safety finding.
9.2-2
No handrail was observed leading upstairs at the time of inspection. This is a safety finding to reduce chance of trip and fall.
Railings, Guards & Handrails
Inspected
9.3-1
The upstairs railing would not meet modern height standards, and a spindle was loose or wobbled; further evaluation and repair by a qualified contractor are recommended.
11. Garage - Summary
Structural
Deficient
11.3-1
Garage wall was not plumb, comments on visual areas only. Not able to determine past or future conditions. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair. As needed.
Interior & Exterior Walls
Inspected
11.4-1
A settlement crack exceeding a quarter inch was noted. This condition may be consistent with ongoing settlement; further evaluation is recommended. Not able to determine future movement.
11.4-2
Deterioration was observed on the garage wall or nearby components. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended. Locating hidden damages goes beyond the scope.
11.4-4
An exposure or gap was observed at the garage wall, indicating advanced deterioration or hidden ongoing damages. Further evaluation is recommended. Advanced wood rot present.
The roof inspection is limited to visible and readily accessible components at the time of the inspection. The inspection does not determine remaining service life, future performance, or confirm proper installation of roofing materials or components. Concealed conditions, weather conditions, roof pitch, height, or other limitations may restrict the inspection. Defects or conditions not visible at the time of the inspection may exist.
1.1-1Mix match shingles were observed, with nearby deterioration noted at the trim. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair of the trim. Determining the exact age of the roof shingles goes beyond the scope of the inspection. The reported condition is based on visual observations made at the time of inspection.
1.1-2Missing granules were observed on the roof covering. This condition is consistent with normal wear and aging of the material.
1.1-3Shingle deterioration was observed on the roof covering materials. This condition may affect the performance and longevity of the roof covering. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified roofing contractor are recommended.
1.1-4Shingles exhibited moderate wear and tear consistent with age at the time of inspection. Determining the exact age and remaining lifespan of the roof covering goes beyond the scope of this inspection.
1.1-5Shingles with damage and missing granules were observed. This condition can lead to accelerated deterioration of the roof covering material. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified roofing contractor are recommended.
1.1-6Cracked shingles with damage and ripped areas with missing granules were observed on the roof covering materials. This condition can lead to premature deterioration and potential moisture intrusion. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair.
1.1-7A shingle was observed to be lifted or not fully bonded at the time of inspection. This condition can compromise the integrity of the roof covering. Repair by a qualified roofing contractor is recommended.
1.2-1The property was observed to lack gutters at the time of inspection. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for installation to help manage water runoff.
Roof exhaust vents should be monitored annually and further evaluated due to lack of full evaluation of the attic. Comments from roof level only.
1.4-1The chimney was observed to be missing a cover. This condition may allow for the entry of rain, debris, and animals into the flue. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for the installation of a chimney cover. Comments on visual areas only.
1.4-2Lifted flashing was observed at the chimney. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended.
The roof structure was observed to be not level in all areas at the time of inspection. This condition is common with age. Although common in homes of this age. Limited view due to conditions in the attic or not fully accessible.
The exterior inspection is limited to visible and readily accessible components at the time of the inspection. The inspection does not determine future performance, remaining service life, or compliance with current building requirements. Conditions concealed by finishes, vegetation, stored items, or other obstructions may not be visible. Maintenance needs, deterioration, and conditions not visible at the time of the inspection may exist.
2.1-1Advanced deteriorating siding was observed at the time of inspection. This condition can lead to further damage and potential moisture intrusion. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement.
2.1-2Deterioration was observed near the flashing and signs of past repairs were noted on the shingles. This condition may lead to further deterioration of the shingle material. Further evaluation by a qualified roofing contractor is recommended.
2.1-3Deterioration was observed at the siding, which appeared to be nearing or at the end of its serviceable lifespan. Repair or replacement of affected siding is recommended as needed.
2.1-4The garage window appeared to be nearing the end of its serviceable lifespan. Nearby wood rot was observed at the siding. Repair or replacement of affected materials is recommended as needed.
2.1-5Advanced wood rot and deterioration was observed at the time of inspection. Further evaluation is recommended. Hidden damages in the area are likely.
2.1-6Deterioration was observed in the area. Elevated moisture levels can contribute to further deterioration of affected materials. Address sources of moisture and repair deteriorated materials as needed.
2.1-7Seal entrance lines, this is a likely entrance point for rodents. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified pest control professional is recommended. General maintenance.
2.1-8Missing sealant was observed at the time of inspection. This condition could allow moisture entry and potential hidden damages, so further evaluation is recommended.
2.1-9Siding deterioration inconsistent with its expected lifespan was observed in localized areas. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement. End of life span in areas.
2.1-10An unknown past repair or patch was observed at the time of inspection. Monitoring this area for any changes over time is recommended.
2.1-11PVC pipe work was present however determining if work performed by persons familiar with standards of practice goes beyond the scope. Comments on visual areas only.
2.1-12Lifting or moving of finish materials was observed nearby; determining the cause goes beyond the scope of this inspection. Further evaluation is recommended to assess for advanced deterioration or wood rot.
2.1-13Advanced wood deterioration was observed around multiple windows or siding. Hidden damages are suspected; determining their extent goes beyond the scope of this inspection, and further evaluation is recommended.
2.1-14A representative number of wood rot was noted. Damaged windows were observed; replacement of materials are needed.
2.1-15Comments regarding trim and vegetation are limited to visually accessible areas.
2.1-16Advanced algae growth was observed under a siding patch or repair, and replacement materials are needed. Further evaluation recommended to ensure proper conditions exist.
2.1-17Advanced wood siding was observed at the time of inspection. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended.
2.1-18Inspection of the dog door goes beyond the scope of this inspection. This item, often considered a personal belonging, presents a likely entrance point or security concern.
2.2-1Peeling paint was observed on the fascia. Consider repainting or other maintenance as needed to help protect the material and extend its serviceable life.
2.3-1Advanced wood rot was observed around many or several of the windows. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified contractor is recommended.
2.3-2Basement window had wood rot and was observed as a likely entrance point for further damages, and further evaluation is recommended.
A cracked window was observed at the time of inspection. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair.
2.3-4Advanced wood deterioration was observed around several or most of the exterior windows. This condition may indicate an entrance point or hidden damages, and further evaluation is recommended.
2.3-5A broken window was observed at the time of inspection. Repair or replacement is recommended.
2.3-6Most, if not all, windows exhibited wood rot or deterioration at the time of inspection. Further evaluation is recommended to determine the extent of damage and necessary repairs.
2.3-7Peeling paint and deterioration were observed on the porch, maintenance as needed.
2.3-8An exposed area was noted at the window, which is a likely entrance point for rodents. Further evaluation and repair are recommended.
2.3-9Window hardware was not responding as designed; the upper portion fell when the lower was opened. Repair by a qualified window specialist is recommended.
2.3-10Window hardware was difficult to operate or close at the time of inspection. Maintenance or repair is recommended.
2.3-11A bee or wasp nest was observed near the windows and fascia. Removal is recommended.
2.3-12Windows that would not meet modern height limitations from the ground were observed. Installation of safety glass windows is recommended.
2.4-1The threshold at or near the door was observed to move or may have rotted, with nearby movement of the wall, . Further evaluation is recommended.
2.4-2A concrete pad was observed to be sloped or not level at the time of inspection. Determining future movement goes beyond the scope of this inspection; monitor this condition.
2.4-3Deterioration was observed on the door, and repair or replacement is recommended. Replace materials as needed.
2.4-4An advanced wood rod was observed at the rear or side entry door. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement.
2.4-5Deterioration and peeling paint were observed on the upstairs level sliding glass door. The materials appear to be past half their lifespan or nearing their end; consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement.
2.4-6Hardware was observed to be difficult to operate or would not properly lock at the time of inspection. Repair is recommended.
2.6-1Deteriorated concrete was observed at the time of inspection. End of life span.
2.6-2The walkway, step, appears to be at the end of its lifespan, with deterioration noted where it meets the siding or home. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement.
2.7-1The concrete surface was sloped toward the home. Water may collect near the foundation during precipitation. Consider improving drainage or redirecting water away from the foundation as needed.
2.8-1The ledger was secured with lag bolts that do not appear consistent with current fastening practices. A qualified professional should evaluate the ledger connection and determine whether updates are needed.
2.8-2Separation or movement of the porch was observed at the time of inspection. Determining if this is past or future movement goes beyond the scope of this inspection; further evaluation is recommended.
2.9-1Deck materials were observed in direct contact with the soil. This condition may lead to premature deterioration over time; monitor for changes. Localized wood rot observed.
2.9-2Peeling paint and deterioration were observed on the deck; replace to increase life span.
2.9-3Maintenance of the deck is recommended to increase the lifespan of materials. Algae growth was observed, which can indicate high moisture levels.
2.9-4Deteriorating deck materials were observed at the time of inspection, based on visual assessment only. This condition can affect the long-term integrity and lifespan of the deck. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or replacement of the affected materials. Materials past half of life span or nearing end of life.
2.10-1A dead tree branch was observed overhanging at the time of inspection. Trimming by a qualified arborist is recommended.
2.11-1Deterioration was observed with nearby damaged trim at the time of inspection. Further evaluation and repair of this condition is recommended.
2.11-2The garage door was observed to be deteriorated at the time of inspection.
2.11-3Building materials were observed in contact with the soil, which will lead to deterioration. Separation of these materials from the soil is recommended.
2.11-4Damage was observed on the nearby siding. Localized wood rot was also noted, and repair is recommended.
2.11-5Siding was observed in contact with soil and will deteriorate over time. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair or correction of this condition.
2.11-6Advanced deterioration with nearby trenching was observed. Further evaluation by a qualified contractor is recommended to determine if safe conditions exist long term.
2.11-7Damaged gutter, and nearby wood rot at fascia were observed, and repair by a qualified professional is recommended.
2.11-8Damage was observed on the gutter at the time of inspection. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair.
2.11-9Advanced wood rot and deterioration were observed where materials are in contact with soil. This condition will continue to deteriorate over time, and repair is recommended.
2.11-10Inspection of the silo goes beyond the scope of this inspection.
2.11-11Damaged material with localized wood rot was observed; further evaluation is recommended.
2.11-12Damaged siding was observed at the time of inspection, and further evaluation by a qualified contractor is recommended.
2.11-13Materials and/or walls that were not plumb were observed. Past or future movement cannot be determined as part of a visual inspection. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended to determine the extent of the condition.
2.11-14The garage door was difficult to slide open due to warped materials.
2.11-15The roof structure was observed to be uneven or not level. Past or future movement cannot be determined as part of a visual inspection. Further evaluation by a qualified structural engineer is recommended.
2.11-16No active moisture was observed at the time of inspection, however stains existed. Determining past or future conditions goes beyond the scope of this inspection.
2.11-17Personal belongings in the garage limited the visual inspection. Comments are based on accessible visual areas only.
2.11-18Advanced deterioration and active moisture entry were observed. A wood rot was also noted; further evaluation and repair by qualified professionals are recommended.
2.11-19Structural components were observed to be not level, and nearby walls were noted as not plumb. Further evaluation by a qualified structural engineer is recommended.
2.11-20Rodent droppings were observed at the time of inspection. Further evaluation and remediation by a qualified pest control professional is recommended.
2.11-21Advanced wood rot was observed on a foundation post. Determining the remaining serviceable life or whether structural repairs are needed goes beyond the scope of a visual inspection. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended.
2.11-22An ungrounded outlet was observed with nearby age electrical components. Does not meet modern standards.
2.11-23The roof of the detached structure was observed to be uneven or not level. Further evaluation by a qualified contractor is recommended. The skylights should be monitored over time for changes or signs of moisture intrusion.
2.11-24The roof structure was observed to be not level at the time of inspection. Determining the cause or extent of past or future movement goes beyond the scope of this inspection; further evaluation is recommended.
2.11-25An odor was noted in the garage at the time of inspection. Determining the source goes beyond the scope of this inspection; further evaluation is recommended.
2.12-1The detached structure was not inspected.
The structural inspection is limited to visible and readily accessible components at the time of the inspection. The inspection does not include engineering analysis or determine structural design adequacy. Concealed conditions, defects within inaccessible areas, or conditions not visible at the time of the inspection may exist. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended when concerns are identified.
3.1-1Wood deterioration and exposed areas were observed. Continued deterioration may increase the chance of future settlement or damage. Further evaluation and repairs by a qualified professional are recommended as needed.
3.1-2Localized deterioration was observed at the stone rubble foundation. Past or future movement or changes cannot be determined as part of a visual inspection. Monitor the area for changes and have a qualified professional evaluate further if conditions change.
3.1-3Settlement and deteriorated conditions were observed at the foundation wall near the parge coat. Past or future movement or changes cannot be determined as part of a visual inspection. Further evaluation by a qualified structural engineer is recommended to determine the extent of the condition and available repair options.
3.1-4Deterioration and movement of the parge coat were observed. These conditions may indicate movement or irregularities in the materials below.
3.1-5A likely entrance point for moisture was observed, and further evaluation is recommended for hidden damage such as wood rot. Visible light gap visible from basement is indication of maintenance/repair to reduce chance of further damages or moisture/insect entry.
3.1-6Water appeared to be entering towards the home at the time of inspection. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified professional is recommended. Re-landscape as needed.
3.1-7A foundation of supports appears to have been removed. Determining past or future conditions goes beyond the scope of this inspection; you may wish to ask seller about this finding.
3.1-8Deteriorated stone and rubble basement floor structure was observed with black visible light. Further evaluation by a qualified structural engineer or contractor is recommended. Limited or no access in areas of the basement.
3.1-9White discoloration was observed on the floor structure. Determining if mold is present goes beyond the scope of this inspection; lab test testing is recommended. Area dry at time however nearby pipes had condensation.
3.1-10Visible light was observed at the basement foundation. Further evaluation by a qualified structural professional is recommended for structural and decay repairs.
3.1-11A settlement crack was noted on the basement stairs. This condition is consistent with normal building movement; monitor for changes.
3.1-12The structure was observed to be not level. Determining past or future conditions goes beyond the scope of this inspection; further evaluation is recommended.
3.2-1Deterioration and stains were observed on a wood rod leading to the basement. Further evaluation is recommended to determine the cause and extent of this condition.
3.2-2Advanced wood rot was observed leading to the basement, and further evaluation and repair by a qualified carpenter is recommended.
3.2-3Stains were observed on the floor structure, which was dry at the time of inspection. It is recommended to monitor this condition over time. Area was dry at time.
3.2-4Deterioration and staining were observed in the basement in the nearby area. The area was dry at the time of inspection. Past or future conditions cannot be determined as part of a visual inspection.
3.2-5The basement door was observed to be nearing the end of its serviceable lifespan. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for replacement and plan for replacement as needed.
Limited views were available in some areas of the basement and crawlspace due to access limitations and/or personal belongings. These areas were not fully inspected, and comments are based on accessible visual areas only. Conditions concealed or not accessible were not inspected.
3.3-1No access was available to this area of the crawlspace. The photograph is representative of the area and is provided for reference only. Conditions in inaccessible areas were not inspected.
3.3-2A full vapor barrier was not present in portions of the crawlspace. Install or extend a suitable vapor barrier as needed to provide more complete ground coverage.
3.3-3Fallen Stone rubble was observed at the time of inspection. Although common in home of this age, Evaluation and correction to increase chance of entry into the crawlspace.
Limited or no access was available in several areas of the crawlspace due to height limitations, debris, fallen stone and rubble, moisture, and lack of a vapor barrier. These conditions restricted access to portions of the crawlspace, and comments are based on accessible visual areas only. Conditions concealed by limited access or debris were not inspected. Further evaluation of the crawlspace and noted conditions is recommended as needed.
3.4-1Advanced wood rot and materials that appear to be bowing were observed in the wall. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended to determine the extent of damage and appropriate repairs.
3.4-2A vertical support in the basement was observed to rely on a shim, with rusted materials noted and resting on stone below. Rusted materials can compromise the integrity of the support over time, and further evaluation by a qualified structural engineer is recommended.
Determining past or future conditions goes beyond the scope of the inspection. Comments are based on visible conditions present at the time of inspection.
The heating system inspection is limited to visible and accessible components and basic operational testing at the time of the inspection. The inspection does not determine efficiency, remaining service life, or compliance with manufacturer specifications. Internal components and conditions not visible or accessible during the inspection may not be evaluated.
4.1-1A component appearing to be abandoned was observed at the time of inspection. Evaluate as desired and remove, repair, or properly seal the component as needed.
4.1-2Heavy corrosion was observed, indicating past moisture. The area was dry at the time of inspection; further evaluation is recommended to determine the source.
4.1-3The furnace was observed responding under normal operation at the time of inspection.
No air conditioning unit was present at the home. An air conditioning system was not available for inspection.
4.4-1Potential asbestos tape was observed on the ductwork at the time of inspection. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended.
The plumbing inspection is limited to visible and readily accessible components at the time of the inspection. The inspection does not determine the remaining service life, capacity, or future performance of plumbing systems. Concealed piping, underground components, and conditions not visible during the inspection may exist.
5.1-1Active moisture was observed at the main water pipe. Correction is recommended to reduce the chance of further moisture-related damage. A qualified plumber can evaluate the connection and provide repair options.
A sulfur odor was noted in the water supply. Further evaluation or correction is recommended.
5.4-1Abandoned pipes and areas were observed at the time of inspection. This is common in homes of this age and for your information only.
5.4-2Deterioration of plumbing components was observed. Further evaluation by a qualified plumber is recommended. (near water heater, monitor or replace).
5.4-3Condensation was observed on a copper pipe at the time of inspection. Monitor, install insulation or reduce humidity in basement.
5.4-4The serial number of the pressure tank was noted.
5.4-5Incomplete or work in progress was observed at the time of inspection. This is for your information only.
Master bedroom shower, sinks(s) ect. were not installed and inspector disclaims knowledge of this condition .
5.7-1The inspector disclaimed knowledge regarding plumbing components or septic systems requiring certification.
5.7-2Underground components are beyond the scope of the inspection. Conditions below grade were not evaluated.
5.7-3The main waste pipe was observed to be galvanized steel with nearby PVC. Underground inspection goes beyond the scope.
5.7-4An abandoned plumbing component or pipe was observed. This is common in homes of this age and for your information only.
5.7-5Corrosion was observed on an abandoned plumbing component, which was dry at the time of inspection. This condition is common in homes of this age; monitor for changes.
Comments on visual areas only.
5.9-1The sump pump appeared to be installed in a dirt excavation rather than a dedicated sump pit. The pump and installation did not appear consistent with modern sump pit installations. Further evaluation by a qualified plumber or contractor is recommended.
5.10-1An intermittent leak was observed, with its source identified by standing water contained by a bucket. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified professional is recommended.
5.10-2The inspection of the water softener goes beyond the scope of this inspection.
5.11-1The invisible fence was beyond the scope of this inspection.
The electrical inspection is limited to visible and readily accessible components at the time of the inspection. The inspection does not include a complete electrical engineering evaluation or verify compliance with all current codes and standards. Concealed wiring, internal components, and conditions not visible during the inspection may exist.
6.1-1Aged wiring components were observed at the time of inspection. Further evaluation by a qualified electrician is recommended.
Comments based on visual areas only. Home appeared to have partially updated system however due to aged components further evaluation is recommended. Lack of certification tags, which limits information for the inspector.
6.2-1A lack of a certification tag was observed. Further evaluation is recommended to determine compliance.
6.3-1Aged electrical components for fuses were observed, lacking a certification tag, which is common in homes of this age. Further evaluation by a qualified electrician is recommended.
6.3-2A lack of certification, tags, or labels was noted at the time of inspection. Further evaluation is recommended. Not able to determine if work was performed by persons unfamiliar with standards of practice preformed work. Evaluation of the fuel system by a qualified Electrician is strongly recommended.
6.4-1A light was not responding at the time of inspection. The cause, whether a missing switch or dark day conditions, could not be determined; further evaluation is recommended.
6.4-2An open junction box was observed at the time of inspection. Repair by a qualified electrician is recommended.
6.4-3Missing face plates were observed in multiple or most areas. Localized reverse polarity was also noted, and further evaluation and repair by a qualified electrician is recommended.
6.4-4An ungrounded electrical receptacle was observed in the kitchen. This is for your information only.
GFCI protection was not observed in the kitchen. Repair by a qualified electrician is recommended to meet modern standards.
6.4-6Two prong outlets were not inspected at the time of inspection.
6.4-7A cracked ground plug was observed at the time of inspection. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified electrician are recommended.
6.4-8A cracked face plate was observed on a light switch. Recommend maintenance or replacement as needed.
6.4-9Missing face plates were observed in eight or more areas or most if not all location. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified electrician is recommended.
6.4-10A fixture was observed that requires evaluation or replacement.
6.4-11Exposed electrical components were observed at the time of inspection. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified electrician is recommended.
6.4-12A loose or hanging light fixture with aged electrical components was observed. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified electrician is recommended.
6.4-13Three-prong outlets were observed to be ungrounded in many locations. Further evaluation and repair by a qualified electrician are recommended.
6.4-14A light fixture was not installed at the time of inspection. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for installation.
6.4-15Determining if work was formed by persons familiar with standard of practice or ongoing work goes beyond the scope of this inspection.
6.4-16A cracked electrical receptacle was observed. Replacement by a qualified electrician is recommended.
6.4-17A light fixture was observed to be missing at the time of inspection. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for installation.
6.5-1Additional smoke and carbon monoxide detectors may be needed to provide adequate coverage throughout the home. Install additional detectors as needed based on current requirements and manufacturer recommendations.
7.1-1Opening abandoned components goes beyond the scope of this inspection. Comments on visual areas only.
The attic inspection is limited to visible and accessible areas at the time of the inspection. Insulation, stored items, limited access, and other conditions may restrict visibility of components. The inspection does not determine future performance of ventilation, insulation, or roofing components. Conditions concealed from view may exist.
8.1-1An abandoned or sealed shut component was observed at the time of inspection. Comments based on visual areas only.
8.1-2A strong odor was present in the attic at the time of inspection. Determining if it is related to rodent or pest activity goes beyond the scope of this inspection; further evaluation is recommended. Live bats observed at time.
8.2-1The attic had staining in areas, however was observed to be dry at the time of inspection. Monitoring is recommended, as past or future conditions cannot be determined.
8.2-2Full access to the attic was limited by a hatch that was not modern size as well as non-safe conditions for the inspector. Removal of bats needs for safe entry. Locate and correct. Obtain cost estimate for removal and cleanup as needed.
8.2-3Rodent droppings were observed in the attic area. This condition can indicate active pest activity and potential contamination. Further evaluation and removal by a qualified pest control professional are recommended.
Comments on visual areas only. No vent fan installed at main floor bathroom. Limited view in attic due to unsafe conditions at time, further evaluation recommend when proper conditions exist.
8.4-1Active bats were observed in the attic. Access to the attic was very limited, and areas that could not be safely accessed were not inspected. Further evaluation by a qualified wildlife professional is recommended.
The interior inspection is limited to visible and readily accessible components at the time of the inspection. Cosmetic conditions, normal wear, and defects hidden by furnishings, personal belongings, finishes, or other obstructions may not be identified. The inspection does not determine future performance or remaining service life of interior components.
Interior unfinished materials were observed at the time of inspection. Updated paint or materials may conceal past damages or defects; ask seller about this finding.
9.1-2Updated paint was observed at the time of inspection. This condition may hide stains or defects; locating hidden defects goes beyond the scope, so obtaining seller disclosure is recommended. Representative photo.
9.1-3Settlement cracks consistent with common shrinkage were observed. Determining past or future movement goes beyond the scope of this inspection; monitor this condition. Common in homes of this age.
9.1-4An interior door was not installed at the time of inspection. Installation of this door is recommended. This is for your information only.
9.1-5Updated paint was observed in localized visual areas only. Localized deterioration. Monitor for changes over time.
9.2-1A handrail was not present for the basement stairs. Installation by a qualified contractor is recommended. This is a safety finding.
9.2-2No handrail was observed leading upstairs at the time of inspection. This is a safety finding to reduce chance of trip and fall.
9.3-1The upstairs railing would not meet modern height standards, and a spindle was loose or wobbled; further evaluation and repair by a qualified contractor are recommended.
The kitchen and appliance inspection is limited to visible components and basic operational testing at the time of the inspection. The inspection does not verify appliance efficiency, remaining service life, or internal mechanical conditions. Conditions not visible or accessible during testing may exist.
10.1-1Corrosion was observed on the plumbing for the washer and dryer. Further evaluation by a qualified plumber is recommended. Area was dry at time. Monitor or maintenance as needed.
10.1-2The washing machine was operated using an extension cord. Extension cords are generally not intended for permanent appliance connections. Have the washer connected directly to a properly installed receptacle as needed.
10.1-3The washing machine was observed draining into a sink, which then discharges directly onto the floor. This can result in water accumulation and localized moisture damage. Provide a proper drain connection and discharge arrangement as needed.
10.1-4A flexible dryer vent was observed that does not meet modern standards. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for replacement or upgrade as desired.
10.1-5The lifespan of the vent hood could not be determined at the time of inspection. Component was aged.
10.1-6The oven was responding, but the digital controls were not responsive for evaluation. Further evaluation of the digital controls is recommended.
Full inspection of appliances goes beyond the scope of the inspection. Appliances are operated only as needed to determine basic function at the time of inspection, when accessible and safe to operate.
10.2-1The serial number for the washing machine was noted.
10.2-2The dryer serial number was noted.
10.2-3The refrigerator serial number was noted.
10.2-4The serial number for the cooktop was noted.
11.1-1Garage wall was not plumb, comments on visual areas only. Not able to determine past or future conditions. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair. As needed.
11.2-1A settlement crack exceeding a quarter inch was noted. This condition may be consistent with ongoing settlement; further evaluation is recommended. Not able to determine future movement.
11.2-2Deterioration was observed on the garage wall or nearby components. Further evaluation by a qualified professional is recommended. Locating hidden damages goes beyond the scope.
11.2-3Comments were made on visual areas only; personal items were present.
11.2-4An exposure or gap was observed at the garage wall, indicating advanced deterioration or hidden ongoing damages. Further evaluation is recommended. Advanced wood rot present.
11.3-1Deterioration and rust were observed in the garage, consistent with age. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair.
An odor was noted in the garage at the time of inspection. Determining the source goes beyond the scope of this inspection; further evaluation is recommended.
Mix match shingles were observed, with nearby deterioration noted at the trim. Consider obtaining a cost estimate for repair of the trim. Determining the exact age of the roof shingles goes beyond the scope of the inspection. The reported condition is based on visual observations made at the time of inspection.